Plans For Building A Mini Tractor

The origin of Christianity is nonsense

Finalmente ho un po' di tempo e la mente abbastanza lucida per poter rimettermi a scrivere su questo blog..

Dico, siamo in quattro e l'unico imbecille a fare costantemente figure del cazzo con post insulsi sono io? Vabbè, stasera non ho di meglio da fare perché in Tv la cosa migliore è “Indiana Jones e l'ultima crociata” che pur essendo un capolavoro I will have seen at least settordici times (thus may be enough ..), did not speak out because the pay is also this month (surprise!) crap, and read the usual delusions cattolebani on your Answer I do not want, what has very thought of having your most affectionate? Trumpet? Yes. why not?

Comment post a mouth-watering, is a bit 'old so maybe someone has already had a way to laugh about it but if it is not ... hang in there in the chair:

The Origin of Science and Christianity

I swear, it says so ..
I rubbed my eyes for a good fifteen minutes before you convince me that you have read well, do not blame the bottle of beer next to the PC or fatigue work ..
I went on reading, I thought it was a joke, a satirical title .. But no!

If you want to savor the delights of this exquisite range delirious I invite you to read the full post ( here) and maybe comment on how good a fate "censor", if you just want to break open ..

Meanwhile, I propose a couple of goodies born of the creative mind of the delusion eatore-ID:

Science and religion were not only compatible, but also inseparable, and science was born thanks to a deeply religious Christian scholars

And, in your opinion, why? Who had the ability to write, copy, read (and talk about change at will or censor) books? There was the Mondadori publishing house at the time, and clutch were those who could read. But if these few educates them from an early age that if they say something contrary to Holy Mother Church will be burned in the flames of hell until the end of time here because you understand the totality of the medieval scholars were believers. If, then, insists his thesis was kindly invited to retract. (Galileo docet)

Small digression: on Wikipedia, under "History" argument: scientific method, are mentioned only casually believers to base its development: the scholastic philosophers of the Middle Ages, Leonardo da Vinci, Galileo Galilei, Immanuel Kant, and Albert Einstein. Small coincidence ...

If Wikipedia says it ... or Leonardo or Galileo or Einstein were philosophers of the medieval scholastic, anyway ...

So the real science, says as a giant among historians: March Bloch, was not born in Greece (Greece) as the science of the Greeks, one thinks, for example, Aristotle, Democritus or Empedocles, was either completely absolutely no empirical or empirical. Ignored or did not involve observable effects, and then the other key element of science.

The Greeks were not real scientists.

Some watched nature so carefully and systematically, despite Socrates considered empiricism, such as astronomical observations, a "waste of time", and Plato would agree, and advised his students to "give up the starry skies" .

Archimedes, the only known author

Here we would like a standing ovation and maybe a Mexican wave: How boiata confirm this? Quoting philosophers and scientists:
philosopher Aristotle was a pupil of Plato, who in turn was a pupil of Socrates, which among other things, he founded the School of Athens (the first few years of the Popes)
also Democritus was a philosopher, invented the atomic theory: Suppose that all agents were made up of similar combinations gave different objects, not bad without a microscope, a telescope but not a magnifying glass ... Empedocles
guess who did? Bravi, the philosopher, whose idea follows more Eastern, a mixture of two opposing forces (Jin and Jang for the Taoists, Love and Discord to Empedocles)

Knowledge greek stagnated in its internal logic. Apart from further developments of geometry occurred very soon after Plato and Aristotle.
The Romans absorbed the greek world, embracing the teachings. But the contribution of Greek culture did not progress intellectually, the Roman world in a meaningful way. And the same happened in the East.

developments of geometry are mentioned in this thing called Euclidean geometry, which is named after Euclid, the founder of a Socratic school known as Megara, the Italian school founded by Pythagoras about 500 years before the birth of Christ whose theorem is still studied in every school (in the face of "very little") and, among others, a certain Archimedes, not to Duckburg, discoverer of physical laws like the law of communicating vessels and buoyancy.
strap Then the Romans .. Among the inventions that enabled us to expand the Roman Empire were the paved road and the arc for the construction of waterworks, things still standing after fifteen hundred years, and luckily there were no significant progress ...
The issue of "East" then hastily closed with "In the east, the same happened" Oh yeah? And what about the Chinese culture? The invention of paper, the compass, the seismograph (yes well have invented that) spaghetti (yes already ..) denote some science, or not? The war machine of the Ottoman Empire? Were made at random, or evolution?

For example, China, the Islamic world, India, ancient Greece and ancient Rome had a very advanced alchemy, but in Europe alchemy evolved into chemistry. Many companies developed elaborate systems of astrology, but only in Europe led to astronomy, astrology. Why?

Maybe because your sacred Guest Book is written that you have to kill anyone who practiced divination and subvert the laws of nature? They had to give them a new name and make them get along with the Inquisition, were otherwise Cock ...

In fact, most non-Christian religions do not require a creation: the universe is cyclical and eternal, without beginning and end. Not being created nn has a creator.

Apart bimbominchiese:
From "Tao Te Ching, the Book of the Way and Virtue:
-L 'One generates the Two, Two gave birth to Three, Three gave birth to the ten thousand creatures -
From "Legends of Australia tribal" AW Reed
-Baiame After a long journey on earth he had created was alone and had nobody to talk to. Picked a little 'red earth and shaped it by giving it the shape of a human being ..-
From "The Greek Myths" Graves R.:
-According to mythology the titan Prometheus was also the creator of humanity, having given man form of a mixture of clay, which also gave the fire-
And so on ...

The school was able to challenge the greek knowledge and developed the science in its explicit opposition to Aristotle and other classical authors. The development of science turned out not as an extension of classical learning. It was the natural consequence of Christian teaching: to love God is to know and appreciate deeply the wonders of His work. Since God is perfect, and Massimo Great Artificer [..], his created works according to immutable principles that according to these scientists may be able to discover through reason and observation [s ] tronomica.

It 's my impression or this one here believes that before the establishment of the Catholic Church were all atheists and completely stupid? Why a deity
Eastern, we take Shiva, should not create the world perfect and beautiful (which is not, but that's another story) because the "immutable principles" should not have been put there by Allah, Zeus or by Ra? were gods fools?

science began as a "handmaiden" of theology

Then he rebelled and did the ass ..

The paradox is that modern atheists, so-called atheistic scientist, living in hope and faith of one day being able to prove the nonexistence of God and refute those who believe based on science.

Atheists scientist? Have imaginary friends as the big man with the beard who created you and loves you from the sand?
You must understand, first, that there is no "Science" are mathematics, physics, biology, etc. .. In fact, there're no all these issues here, there are people who study, people in the flesh (and mostly true) subject to discussion, errors, misunderstandings and even colds, and that their job is to make the biologists, physicists, mathematicians, not to worry about showing that there is an invisible superhero creator of all that is watching us day and night ready to beat hell.
science progresses, every day, and thanks to these people, theology (the study of nothing) no. If not amazing scrambling to make scientific discoveries get along with a book written by pastors of the Bronze Age. And if a scientist is also believed to have a friend imagination that he loves him who cares?

Compatible, I wanted to remind them that without the talent and the faith of those who believe there was not even modern science.

Giordano Bruno, skeptical about these claims

So thanks to all the inquisitors, torturers, the cardinals who sold absolution, the Popes excommunication to those that emitted tried to think otherwise and so on ..
Thanks also to the interference of the Holy See on the use of embryonic stem cells on artificial insemination, on cloning and so on. You have given so much in the world now: the fuck out, thanks.

Astaroth, October 11, 2010

PS While the TV is giving nonsense worthy of the worst tribal Amazonian show (what was to be Italy-Serbia , valid for the European Football Championship qualifying : yuck Uefa, how disgusting that these morons and suck modern football, tomorrow I make the card at the bowling club ... )
The Demotiviatonal ( the image on a black background that opens this post) the use of which has been widely encouraged by the Supreme (bow) Reverend SpaghettoVolante here and here is taken from one of the finest adventures of the Roman Catholic Church: The Synod of the corpse of Pope Formoso, I swear, I did not invent anything, we really came first ..