How To Create A Wrestler Online

God exists?

I was invited to participate in the life of this blog that began as a offshoot of Answers R & D, it gave me great pleasure, because among those who have already given Their contribution is a great friend like Erich take this opportunity to say hello. take advantage of this space to expand the topics on Answers who, as it is organized, does not allow much deeper.


When someone, skeptical or just curious, asks believers as evidence of God's answers are varied, sometimes falling in humor involuntary or grotesque, usually are nothing more than variations of a single argument: "God exists because it can not be so."
E below describes one or more phenomena not yet fully understood or fully explained by modern science:
- Miracles are evidence of the existence of God;
- We do not know how did the first living cell, then God exists;
- We do not know how man is different from the apes, then God exists;
- do not know what triggered the Big Bang, then God exists;
Etc ... etc ...

Given that in many cases it is not true that there is no explanation of these phenomena, I should like to dwell on the argument itself, so that believers in saying that "There are unexplainable things, then God exists" does not realize that they actually deny the existence, or at least put in doubt.
The basic point is just that: the difference between the unexplained and inexplicable.

If these phenomena are considered, as should properly be, inexplicable, even semantically, we believe that sooner or later will be explained, and then even now there is no need to bother God for the believer
But these phenomena are inexplicable, are EXPLAINED, very different, since using the word erase the possibility that prima o poi possano essere spiegati.

Ed escludere la possibilità che un particolare fenomeno possa essere spiegato implica che:
- La scienza non farà più alcuno sviluppo in quella direzione.
Quindi:
- Viviamo nel momento di massima conoscenza del genere umano, dal momento che non ci saranno ulteriori sviluppi
Quindi:
- Non esiste possibilità di conoscenza, civilizzazione o sviluppo superiore a quelli attuali.
Se escludiamo che non esista possibilità di conoscenza superiore a quella posseduta dall’uomo in questo momento storico, l’ovvia conseguenza è che l’uomo è l’apice delle creature dell’universo. E non esiste alcuna possibilità che there is a being superior to man. So we exclude God


If we admit the existence of God we should also admit that there is a level of knowledge than that possessed by humans at the moment.
And if there is a higher level of knowledge, man could master a part and come into possession of information that do not currently possess.
And if we know in the future, we will also ignore notions that currently account for phenomena that today we are not able to explain.

So the argument "There are things that science does not explain, and then God exists" is a blunder, however, is the turnarounds.

ARGUMENT RANDOM from my Blog
347) Argument of the squared circle
(1) The square circles do not exist.
(2) God is not a squared circle.
(3) Therefore God exists.

Hello.