Thursday, January 29, 2009

They Hit My Car And Their Going To Pay

clear that I love is NOT BRECHT


Without detracting from the worship and adorattissimo Bertold Brecht , may I say not to Darel things for granted. " It is not obstinacy, and certainly not arrogance: it is critical force.

For months, specifically since the Mayor Alemanno has started this odious "circus-fingerprint-census" on Roma people of our city, which circulates a poem attributed to the great and indisputable Brecht.

Then, we, citizens decidedly Venusian, copy and send, copy and send, copy and send ....

I want to say: IT IS NOT 'HER.

Below title and poetry, as well as naturalemnte author.



Martin Niemoller wrote:

First they came for the gypsies
and I was glad, for stealing.

Then they came for the Jews
and I said nothing because I was being disagreeable.

Then they came for the homosexuals,
and I was relieved, because I was annoying.

Then they came for the Communists,
and I said nothing because I was not a Communist.

One day they came for me,
and there was nobody left to protest

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Sony Hook Hardrive To Tv

Eluana the Bresso to Cardinal Poletto, "It is a republic of the ayatollahs" The Speech


an article by Edward Buffon, La Repubblica

ROME - "Believers can not be recalled with the diktat. I think it's a mistake to enter the Church in this way, arrived on foot, on such a sensitive matter, on which millions of Catholics around the world every day make decisions very similar to those of the family Englaro, and do so with pain and difficulty. This Church knows, and there are many Catholic doctors who must make difficult decisions every day, and I'm torn. interventions should be sensitive . We are in danger of losing the secular character of our state with this kind of controversy. "

It 's the strong response of Mercedes Bresso, President of Piedmont, to the criticisms leveled against her, in an interview with La Repubblica, Archbishop of Turin, Cardinal Severino Poletto. Mercedes Bresso - Governor of the Democratic Party - has intervened directly in the Republic TV this morning.

"A Poletto, reminiscent of the Catholic doctors to conscientious objection, I ask: what is the difference between today's Italy and the clerical state, like that of the Ayatollah, which is enjoined to all believers to take a certain behavior? One thing is a recommendation, the expression of a position that I consider absolutely legitimate Another thing is the injunction to persons who are required to comply with the laws of your country that until proven otherwise is still a secular state ".
Why
Bresso has come forward on a story so hard? "I think there is a duty of public facilities to implement the decision of the Supreme Court, which also was taken twice because there was a cancellation for formal reasons. Since this is a very sensitive issue on an ethical level, it is clear that While there is in our legal conscientious objection of doctors for the 194 if not explicitly stated, it is clear that no one who does not wish to be obliged to intervene in this case. I remember, however, that Catholic doctors and non-Catholics, believers and nonbelievers every day with their families take such decisions and I see that other principle take only what comes dall'habeas corpus, the founding of Western law, namely the decision of a person and who that person represents when it is no longer able to decide. "

" In the past we had offered as the Piedmont Region our willingness to Englaro family. And I repeat: the Ministry's circular Sacconi does not pass the law, and interpretation of the law is not the job of the executive. E 'disturbing it to bend the law to a political decision. If there are problems in applying the protocol, will be discussed in full compliance, with the family. I'm worried: I see only threatened the secular principle of respect for people is to self-determination. For this you need a law on living wills. The medicine will in a few years to keep anyone alive, and then what will we do? Eluana is a person in a permanent vegetative state, not a disability. "

" I have not imposed anything to anyone - insists FirstCall / - If there are contacts, will be directly between the Englaro family and our health. Those who have something imposed is the president of the Lombardy region, Formigoni, which prohibited any work on Eluana in its region. "What structures would be ready?" If I knew, I would not say, for reasons of confidentiality. The family chose a difficult route, legality, exposing criticism and waste. Now he has the right to privacy ".

In transmission, against the choice of Bresso, also spoke Eugenia Roccella, Welfare Undersecretary of the PDL by delegation to bioethical issues." I fear that there will be strong difficulties to apply that ruling. There are problems between public health and the way in which it was made that decree. There is a level of service - explained Roccella - in which to place a protocol like that. It 'hard to place a protocol to bring a sick person, who may live many years and being treated, end stage and let it die. Why is this you ask. It asks that a patient rather than cure and it leads to death. Any public health facility that will try to do this will find that there are problems. "" We are faced with a disability - said Eugenia Roccella - and not a person in a permanent vegetative state. "

(January 22, 2009)

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Dealing With Blepharitis



Fellow citizens, today I stand here before you with humility, grateful for the trust you have bestowed, mindful of the sacrifices borne by our ancestors. I thank President Bush for his service to our nation, as well the generosity and cooperation he has shown during this transition.

Forty Americans have taken the presidential oath. The words have been spoken during rising tides of prosperity and the waters of peace. Furthermore, the oath is taken under a sky full of clouds and raging storms. In these moments, America goes not just for the skill or the vision of those in high office, but because we the people have remained faithful to the ideals of our ancestors, and true to our founding documents . So it was. So it must be with this generation of Americans.

That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood. Our nation is at war against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred. Our economy is severely weakened as a result of greed and irresponsibility of some, but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new era. Homes have been lost, cut jobs, closed business. Our health care is too expensive, our schools fail too many, and every day brings further evidence that the ways we use energy and strengthen our adversaries threatening our planet.

These are indicators of crisis, subject to data and statistics. Less measurable but equally profound is the sapping of confidence in our land: the nagging fear that the decline is inevitable, and that the next generation should lower its sights. Today I say that the challenges we face are real. They are serious and they are many. They will not be won easily or in a short period of time. But know this, America will be met. On this day, we gather because we have chosen hope over fear, unity of purpose on the conflict and discord. On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn-out dogmas, which for too long have strangled our policy.

remain a young nation, but in the words of Scripture, the time has come to put aside childish things. The time has come to reaffirm our enduring spirit, to choose our better history, to carry forward that precious gift, that noble idea, passed on from generation to generation: the God-given promise that all are equal, all are free, and all deserve a chance to fully achieve their happiness.

In reaffirming the greatness of our nation, we understand that greatness is never taken for granted. It must be earned. Our journey has never been one of shortcuts or rebates. It was not a path for the faint of heart, for those who prefer leisure to work, or seek only the pleasures of wealth and fame. E 'was instead the path of those who take risks, of doers, the makers of things: some celebrated but more often men and women in their obscure efforts that have brought us to the top of a long and difficult path towards prosperity and freedom.

For us, they packed up their few worldly possessions and traveled across the oceans in search of a new life.

We have toiled in factories and settled the West, endured the lash of the whip and plowed the hard earth.

We have fought and died in places like Concord and Gettysburg, Normandy, and Khe Sahn.

Again and again these men and women have struggled and sacrificed and worked till their hands in blood, so that we might have a better future. They saw America as bigger than the sum of our individual ambitions, larger than all differences of birth or wealth or faction.

This is the journey that continue today. We remain the most prosperous, powerful nation on Earth. Our workers are less productive than when the crisis began. Our minds are no less inventive, our goods and services no less necessary in the last week or last month or last year. Our ability to remain intact. But our time to stand still, to protect narrow interests and putting off unpleasant decisions, the time has surely passed. Starting today, we must pick ourselves up, stand up and begin again the work of remaking America.

For everywhere we look, there work to do. The state of the economy calls for bold action and promptly, and we will act not only to create new jobs, but to lay the foundation for growth. Build the roads and bridges, electricity networks, digital lines that feed our trade and bind us together. Restore science to its rightful place of law and wield the wonders of technology to improve healthcare quality and lower costs. We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and our factories. It will transform our schools and colleges and universities to meet the demands of a new era. All this we can do it. And all this will do.

There are some who question the extent our ambitions, which suggest that our system can not tolerate too many big plans. They have a short memory. They have forgotten what this country has already done what free men and women can achieve when the imagination is joined to a common purpose, the need for courage.

What the cynics fail to understand is that the ground has shifted beneath their feet, the stale political arguments that have consumed us for so long no longer apply. The question we ask today is whether our government is too big or too small, but if it works: if it helps families find jobs with decent salaries, care they can afford a retirement that is dignified. When the answer is yes, we intend to move forward. When the answer is no, the programs will end. And those of us who manage public dollars will be held to account: to spend wisely, to reform bad habits, and do the work in the light of their own, because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and its government .

Nor is the question whether the market is a force for good or for evil. Its power to generate wealth and expand freedom comparisons, but this crisis has reminded us that without a watchful eye, the market can go out of control, and that a nation can not prosper long if it favors only the rich. The success of our economy depends not only on the size of our gross domestic product, but the reach of our prosperity, our ability to extend opportunity to every willing heart, not out of charity but because it is the surest route to the common good.

As for our common defense, we reject as false choice between our security and our ideals. The Founding Fathers, in the face of dangers that we can scarcely imagine, drafted a charter that would guarantee the respect of law and human rights, a charter expanded by the blood of generations. Those ideals still light the mondoe not give them up as needed. And all the people and governments today look, from the great capitals of the small village where my father was born, I say, know that America is a friend of every nation and every man, woman and child who seeks a future of peace and dignity, and that we are ready to lead.

Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism, not only with tanks and missiles, but with strong alliances and enduring convictions. They understood that our strength is not enough to protect us, nor gives the right to do as we please. Instead, they knew that power grows when we make a prudent use our security emanates from the fact that our cause, the power of our example, the qualities of humility and restraint.

We are the custodians of this legacy. Guided by these principles once again, we can meet those new threats that demand even greater efforts - and even greater cooperation and understanding among nations. We will begin to responsibly leave Iraq to its people, and forge a peace paid a heavy price in Afghanistan. With old friends and former enemies, we will work tirelessly to reduce the nuclear threat, and the specter of a warming planet. We will not apologize for our way of life, nor will we waver in its defense, and those who seek to advance their goals through terror and massacre of innocent people, we say that our spirit is strong and can not be broken. Not outlast us, and we will defeat.

Because we know that our diverse heritage is a strength, not a weakness, we are a nation of Christians, Muslims, Jews and Hindus - and non-believers, are shaped by every language and culture, from every corner of the earth. And since we felt the bitter cup of civil war and racial segregation, and emerged stronger and more united, we can not but believe that long-standing hatred of one day disappear, the boundary of the tribe shall be dissolved, which as the world grows smaller, our common humanity will come to light, and that America must play its role in ushering in a new era of peace.

the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect. To those leaders in the world who seek to sow discord, or to download the West to blame the ills of their society, know that your people will judge you based on what you are able to build, not destroy. To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the repression of dissent, you know that you are on the wrong side of history, but we are willing to reach out if you are willing to break the fist.

To the people of poor countries, we pledge to work together with you to make your farms and clean water slide, to feed hungry minds and bodies. And to those nations like us are lucky enough to enjoy a relative abundance, we say that we can no longer afford to be indifferent to the suffering outside our borders, nor can we consume the planet's resources without considering the consequences. Because the world has changed, and we must change with it.

Looking back to the road unfolds before us, we remember with humble gratitude to those brave Americans who currently patrol desert and distant mountains. They have something to say, as the whisper that comes to us over the years fallen heroes who lie in Arlington: We honor them not only because they are guardians of our freedom, but because they embody the spirit of service, the desire to find meaning in something greater than themselves. Yet at this moment - a moment that will define a generation - it is precisely this spirit that should animate us all.

Why, for what the government should and can do, it is ultimately the faith and determination of the American people on which this nation relies. And 'good enough to take in a stranger when the levees break, the selflessness of workers who would rather not see a friend lose their job to guide us in our darkest hours. And 'the courage of the firefighter who faces a staircase filled with smoke, but also the readiness of a parent to nurture a child, which ultimately decides our fate.

Our challenges may be new, the tools with which we meet may be new, but the values \u200b\u200bupon which our success - hard work and honesty, courage and fair play, tolerance and curiosity, loyalty and patriotism - these things are old. These things are true. They have been the quiet force of progress throughout our history. What is needed is a return to these truths. What we require now is a new era of responsibility - a recognition on the part of every American, we have duties to ourselves, our nation and the world, duties that do not grudgingly accept, but rather seize with joy, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing more satisfying to the spirit, More of our character, which give it all to a difficult task.

This is the price and the promise of citizenship.

This is the source of our confidence the notion that God calls us to shape an uncertain fate. This is the meaning of our freedom and our creed: why men and women and girls of every race and every faith can come together in celebration through this beautiful avenue, and why a man whose father sixty years ago could not be served at the restaurant can now stand before you to take a sacred oath.

So mark this day with remembrance of who we are and how far we have. In the year of birth, in the colder months, a small band of patriots huddled by fires dying on the shores of an icy river. The capital was abandoned. The enemy was advancing, the snow was stained with blood. And when our revolution was most in doubt, the father of our nation ordered that these words were read to the people: "Let it be told to the future world ... That in the depth of winter, when nothing but hope and courage could survive ... That the city and the country, alarmed at a common danger, came forth to meet him. "

America. In the face of our common dangers, in this winter of our labors, let us remember these timeless words. With hope and courage, once again we face the icy currents, and endure the storms to come. What the children of our children can say that when we were pulled back to test there or stumbled, and with eyes fixed on the horizon and the grace of God with us, we carried forward the great gift of freedom, and delivered it safely to future generations.

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Bugatti Engine Schematics

not saying D'Alema: says the first Mossad and Olmert hours


I always do. Carry-over sul mio blog articoli o argomenti che "devono" interessare prima di tutti le persone democratiche di questo maledetto e blasonato Paese. Mi permetto di riproporre qui sotto l'editoriale di Barbara Spinelli uscito l'11 gennaio 2009 su La Stampa e riproposto ieri sera da Moni Ovadia a "Parla con me". Sarebbe ora di capire, e lo dico da fanciulla, che la propoganda su alcune tragedie umane, tra cui in primis quella dei palestinesi a Gaza e quella dell'annoso conflitto arabo-israeliano, non giova alla democrazia interna e neanche al confronto internazionale. Per non parlare dei danni sulla già tracotante superficilaità umana che parla di isrealiani ed ebrei come fossero la stessa cosa e magari, davanti ad una battuta antisemita, fa ancora strizzare l'occhio to someone.

Happy reading and good peace to the world.

"Not long before the offensive against Gaza, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to put himself and his people demand a cold, unprecedented. A question not on the values \u200b\u200band morals, but the pure utility.

was Sept. 29, in an interview with Yedioth Ahronoth denounced forty years of blindness: one of Israel's own. He said it was time, can not be postponed, in which the state was changing its nature and choose how to live and survive if constantly warring, or seeking peace with their neighbors. did not deny the crimes of Hamas and several Arab states, but urged the fellow to focus on 'own burden of guilt. "

The burden was militarized in the automatic thought: "The efforts of a Prime Minister should pursue the peace or continuing desire to make the country stronger, louder, louder, with the goal to win a war?". He added that personally was tired of reading the reports from their own general: "Have not they learned anything? For them there are only tanks and earth, the control of territories and controlled territories, the conquest of this and that hill. All things without value. "

The only value was to find peace, punishable a single condition: liquidating the colonies, returning "almost all if not all the territories," giving the Palestinians "the equivalent of what Israel will keep for himself." Was rendered to Syria the Golan Heights, the Palestinians part of Jerusalem. Thus spoke the Prime Minister of Israel, not a preconceived enemy of the Jewish state and its people. These words seem to spent a huge amount of time and today are but smoke and a hunger for wind, as in Qohelet. So the opportunity was imperative nearby. Not even three months later, the war is decreed "no alternative". Then

Olmert seemed to listen to the intellectuals opposed to military solutions: Tom Segev Gideon Levy Abraham Yehoshua that among the first, La Stampa, has called a truce in recent days. Three months after the militarized thinking and dissent on again clears. There are only Segev, Gideon Levy, Yossi Sarid. Even Yehoshua considers vain a proportionate response to Hamas rockets, "because the endurance and resistance of the Palestinians is infinitely superior to that of the Israelis." The application of cold

Olmert, in September, was as follows and remains valid: 'What shall we do after winning a war? We will pay heavy price after they have paid and we say to the opponent: we begin a negotiation. " According to Olmert, Israel was at a crossroads: "For forty years we have refused to see reality with eyes open (...). We have lost all sense of proportion. " Quite a few things

intuits, although journalists are not permitted theater of war. This landscape, we see that for days on screens behind the reporter, it is virtually all of Gaza, no more than 40 km in length, 9.7 km deep. With 360 square kilometers, Gaza is smaller than Rome and home to 1.5 million Palestinians. Inevitable that in a tiny strip so many civilians are killed (half of those killed, according to some). But wonder whether the Israeli government does not persist in blindness, when they deny that their war is against civilians and a humanitarian disaster. Israel has serious reasons to camp: Hamas missiles on cities of the South, for years, despite the unilateral withdrawal ordered by Sharon in 2005, generating anger and anguish unspeakable, even if the dead are not many.

But there are things left unsaid in those who are rightly indignant: things that they hide themselves, hard to admit, not true. It is not true, first, that the State of Israel will react without wanting to penalize civilians. Targeting the places from which the rockets of Hamas, Hamas, and now it knows that missiles will be moved elsewhere, and that in those places will only be civilians, old men, women and children.

They say it themselves, to reporters: "When parte un missile vicino alle nostre case, scuole, moschee, sappiamo che non Hamas sarà colpito, ma noi». La domanda è tremenda: come spiegare agli abitanti di Gaza la differenza con rappresaglie che, come a Marzabotto, sacrificarono centinaia di civili al posto di introvabili partigiani? Secondo: non è vero che non esistessero alternative all’attacco aereo e terrestre.

Se la tregua con Hamas non ha funzionato, è perché mai iniziò veramente. Perché i coloni avevano evacuato la Striscia ma Israele manteneva il controllo dei cieli, del mare, dei confini. Il cessate il fuoco negoziato a giugno prevedeva la fine del lancio di missili palestinesi ma anche la rimozione del blocco di Gaza, imputabile a Israele. The missiles are decreased, although not disappeared: it fell by the hundreds in May and June, they have fallen less than 20 in the next four months. Nothing happened but for the block.

This is the "burden of guilt" in Israel, not small, and once again helps to understand the geography. He says the government of Israel that Gaza belongs to Palestinians since 2005, but it did not do anything. It is false too, because Gaza is not reliant on being put to the test. Not only lacks the control of air, sea.

There are six crossing points that would allow transit of food, water, electricity, men (along the border with Israel to the Erez crossing point North, the Nahal Oz crossing, Karni, Kissufim, Sufa East, on the border with Egypt Rafah crossing point) and all are closed. For Gaza as a crumb is impossible to live without coll'esterno relations, and they are stuck since Hamas won the elections and broke with Fatah.

Even in this case an entire population pays for politicians, and when Cardinal Martino talks about the concentration camp (Others talk of open-air prison) is not going away from the facts. The tunnels used to smuggle weapons, it is true. But also to bring food, medicine, industrial spare parts. The humanitarian disaster in Gaza did not begin today. And that million and a half is there because the army cacciatovi Israel in '48.

The punishment is the key word, in several Israeli wars. But the punishment of civilians en masse in reality does not punish anyone, and increases in homicidal rage and contemporary descendants. It is a kind of revenge performed. It's war-free therapeutic moral inhibitions, war made to roll his eyes, writes Yossi Sarid (Haaretz, January 9). It is not only fierce, but in vain. The Hamas rockets continue to strike and have even extended the range: now hit Beer Sheva (36 km from the Dimona nuclear plant) and the base at Tel Nof (27 kilometers from Tel Aviv). Gaza and West Bank are more interdependent than ever.

What happens in the West Bank has weighed bitterly about Gaza, and weighs more. In this case, yes, there is no alternative to decolonization and withdrawal. Israel, too, like many empires, must come through here. You should stop separating the theaters of action: to build new settlements every time negotiating or whenever makes war on other fronts, in Lebanon or Gaza.

It also fears that today Dror Etkes, coordinator of Israeli Yesh Din (Volunteers for Human Rights): "I certify that in these hours are opening in the West Bank land for a new settlement at Etz Ephraim, and for a outpost at Kedumim. In a book of Idith Zertal and Akiva Eldar (Lords of the Land, New York 2007) has written that la pace è irraggiungibile se non si riconosce che ogni singola colonia, e non solo i cosiddetti avamposti illegali, viola la legge internazionale; se non ci si spoglia dell’ossessione delle armi e delle terre idolatrate, che Olmert stesso ha denunciato poche settimane fa."

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Rubber Band Ligation External Hemorrhoids

Close on living wills. 50 thousand signatures for the freedom of treatment


articolo tratto da Repubblica.it

ROMA - La questione del testamento biologico accelera. A breve, nonostante le divisioni che agitano, trasversalmente, gli schieramenti, il Pdl porterà in commissione Sanità al Senato un testo unificato, mentre venerdì il Pd si riunirà in un seminario per tentare di stabilire una linea unitaria in vista dell'accelerazione Member. All the while the call for a law on living wills, was launched from the Democratic Party Senator Ignazio Marino reaches 50 thousand accessions and continue to sign on the site of the appeal.

According to the advance text of the majority of states to respect freedom of the doctor's decision on medical treatment be applied to the patient and allowing the patient to speak only on the treatment to follow but not to decide whether to live or die. Principles facing doubts even within the same majority. "If this is the text seems unlikely to be shared," says Benedetto della Vedova, president of the liberal reformers.

But if the majority is divided, the Democratic Party is likely to break. Ended in a stalemate the work of the Committee of Six ", which included teodem Marino and Senator Paola Binetti, Veltroni's party decided to run for cover by organizing the seminar on Friday. Looking for, so, to ensure that the living will not register a deep rift between the different souls of Democrats.

Meanwhile Marino initiative continues to gather signatures. Scroll through the list of signatures stand out as Nobel Prize winner Rita Levi Montalcini, the founder of the Republic, Eugenio Scalfari, Miriam Mafai, Corrado Augias, secretary general of the CGIL, Guglielmo Epifani. And yet Umberto Veronesi, Luciana Littizzetto and coach national, Marcello Lippi. Their names and those of many common people have to touch 50 thousand share. All together to demand a law that if you were to lose their freedom of expression, can give the possibility to indicate which therapies to be tested and those not. A will that if there had been, would have avoided the harrowing story of the dripping Eluana. (Matthew TONELLI)